E Amazings – Money management
  • Home
  • Automotive
  • Business
  • CBD
  • Crypto
  • Education
  • Entertainment
  • Fashion
  • Finance
  • Health
  • Home Improvement
  • Law \ Legal
  • News
  • Shopping
  • Sports
  • Technology
  • Travel
  • Need Help?

Subscribe to Updates

Get the latest creative news from FooBar about art, design and business.

What's Hot

What Closing Costs Do Home Buyers Have?

February 25, 2023

What Is Realtek HD Audio Manager

February 2, 2023

A Basic Guide To Cell Tower Leasing

February 2, 2023
Facebook Twitter Instagram
E Amazings – Money management
  • Home
  • Automotive
  • Business
  • CBD
  • Crypto
  • Education
  • Entertainment
  • Fashion
  • Finance
  • Health
  • Home Improvement
  • Law \ Legal
  • News
  • Shopping
  • Sports
  • Technology
  • Travel
  • Need Help?
Facebook Twitter Instagram
E Amazings – Money management
You are at:Home»News»NYCHA’s “Public Housing Preservation Trust” Is A Farce of Resident Engagement
News

NYCHA’s “Public Housing Preservation Trust” Is A Farce of Resident Engagement

By June 22, 2022No Comments6 Mins Read
Facebook Twitter Pinterest LinkedIn Tumblr Email
Share
Facebook Twitter Pinterest WhatsApp Email

[ad_1]

“Just this year alone, public budgets allocated billions of dollars in federal spending for military intervention abroad, the state subsidy of a billionaire’s football stadium in Buffalo, and even over a billion dollars in city funding for the PACT conversions of public housing to private management companies rather than for public housing itself.”

Adi Talwar

NYCHA’s Gun Hill Houses, where 1,450 people live.

CityViews are readers’ opinions, not those of City Limits. Add your voice today!

On Monday, May 23rd, two competing visions for public housing and the New York City Housing Authority (NYCHA) were on display. At NYCHA’s Polo Grounds Towers community in Harlem, housing authority officials alongside Mayor Eric Adams and other local elected officials held a press conference advocating for passage of the proposed “Public Housing Preservation Trust” legislation in Albany.

Throughout the nearly one-hour press conference, officials consistently touted the resident engagement and support for the Trust, although just two tenant association presidents were chosen to represent public housing residents, with each reading from prepared statements. While speakers at the press conference repeatedly peddled the idea that the Trust would be able to finally fund the housing authority’s long overdue repair and maintenance needs, there were precious few details about how exactly that would happen. The word “debt” for example—the primary motivator behind establishing the Trust and the financing mechanism planned to raise funds for repairs—was only mentioned once, and only in a brief response to a reporter’s question near the close of the conference.

The Trust was first introduced in 2020 as part of NYCHA’s Blueprint for Change and heavily promoted during the early throes of the COVID-19 pandemic that disproportionately devastated public housing residents. The proposal is now in its third iteration after fierce and steadfast resident opposition due to the bill’s reliance on debt-financing mechanisms for repairs that would prioritize creditors and debt-service over residents and community needs, open the possibility for future foreclosure, and ultimately dismantle true Section 9 public housing in the city.

Despite these glaring concerns and consistent resident opposition, the bill—which Gov. Kathy Hochul signed into effect last week—has received a renewed round of support from NYCHA, elected officials, and even a cadre of nonprofits and housing advocacy groups, largely on the basis of a new amendment with the promise of an “opt-in” provision. Like the vague promises of repair funds coming through the Trust, speakers at the press conference, and elected officials’ endorsements of the bill, parroted NYCHA’s company line regarding the opt-in, claiming it to be an empowering democratic choice to enter the Trust based on resident votes on a per campus basis.

The optics around the opt-in have proven persuasive, leading to self-proclaimed Democratic Socialist State Sen. Julia Salazar to sponsor the bill’s reintroduction in the Senate at the eleventh hour, and despite clear resident resistance.

The bill’s language, however, falls far short from establishing any true resident decision-making, or even ensuring a representative voting process. Instead, the only mention of a “voting process” in the bill is in reference to a vote before the Trust itself transfers or mortgages a development to another entity, presumably a real estate developer, bank, or private equity firm. The bill also makes no mention of the specifics behind a resident vote, the minimum participation needed for a quorum, or the outreach and information needed for residents to make an informed decision. By NYCHA’s own admission, previous resident voting processes have hovered around a 10 percent participation rate, signaling that any haphazard voting procedure will be far from representative.

All told, this makes the much-celebrated opt-in amendment little more than an appeal to better the already sullied optics of the plan. The fact that the bill was newly reintroduced in the Senate despite these glaring issues is indicative of the inherently flawed and superficial resident engagement process in the legislation, and the PR campaign to support it.

But even if the bill offered a truly democratic resident vote before a community entered the Trust model, the choice currently presented to residents would still pose a false dichotomy. Elected officials in favor of the Trust across each level of government have positioned the future of public housing at the crossroads between either embracing privatization through the Trust (or for some communities RAD/PACT), or maintaining an ever worsening status quo of substandard living conditions.

READ MORE: What is RAD, and What Does it Mean for the Future of NYCHA?

This creates a coercive choice for residents who have been denied any avenue for improving their living conditions outside of acquiescing to a privatization scheme. Asking residents to choose between accepting a fraught plan, or continue facing substandard (and sometimes fatal) living conditions due to government inaction is no choice at all.

True resident leaders, public housing tenants, and organizers, however, see a third way forward: fully funding public housing with public funds. While elected officials have preferred to pass the buck on government funding for NYCHA from city, to state, to federal budgets, in truth, each level has been culpable in the decades-long disinvestment of public housing communities. Just this year alone, public budgets allocated billions of dollars in federal spending for military intervention abroad, the state subsidy of a billionaire’s football stadium in Buffalo, and even over a billion dollars in city funding for the PACT conversions of public housing to private management companies rather than for public housing itself.

Public housing residents citywide have been clear and steadfast in their opposition to the Trust bill since it was proposed, prompting the legislation to be amended repeatedly before this recent third round of revisions and its newly included opt-in provision. Over the last three years, opposition to the Trust has not waned, but only grown. On the same day as NYCHA’s press conference, residents and organizers alongside a select few elected officials held their own rally in front of City Hall, where resident leaders, and public housing tenants from each borough called for an immediate halt to the Trust legislation, and an increased influx of public funds into the housing authority.

Unlike NYCHA and the Trust legislation, the residents’ message has been clear and consistent: fully fund NYCHA and save truly public housing in New York City.

Marquis Jenkins is a longtime resident of NYCHA’s Bracetti Plaza, and founding member of Residents to Preserve Public Housing (RPPH). James Rodriguez, Ph.D. is a longtime resident of NYCHA’s Rutgers Houses, and assistant professor of Urban Studies at the City University of New York. Aixa Torres is the President of NYCHA’s Alfred E. Smith Resident Association, and member of NYCHA’s Citywide Council of Presidents (CCOP).

[ad_2]

Source link

Related Posts

NYC Housing Calendar, Jan. 5-11

By January 4, 2023

Feds Can Further ‘Fair Housing’ Goals by Adequately Funding NYCHA

By January 3, 2023

NYC’s Floundering ‘Right to Counsel’ Fails to Keep Pace With Eviction Cases

By January 3, 2023

New York City, 2022: A Year in Photos

By December 30, 2022
Add A Comment

Comments are closed.

Our Picks

What Closing Costs Do Home Buyers Have?

By Corbin BowenFebruary 25, 2023

What Is Realtek HD Audio Manager

By Corbin BowenFebruary 2, 2023

A Basic Guide To Cell Tower Leasing

By Corbin BowenFebruary 2, 2023
Recent Posts
  • What Closing Costs Do Home Buyers Have? February 25, 2023
  • What Is Realtek HD Audio Manager February 2, 2023
  • A Basic Guide To Cell Tower Leasing February 2, 2023
  • Air Duct Repair 101: Everything You Need To Know February 2, 2023
  • Advantage LIC? How Budget Insurance Amendment Bill may benefit the PSU insurance giant January 5, 2023
  • The Flight Of The Dremel January 5, 2023
  • LIC offering multiple benefits on premium payment with co-branded credit cards with Axis Bank: Check features, offer January 5, 2023
Archives
  • February 2023
  • January 2023
  • December 2022
  • November 2022
  • October 2022
  • September 2022
  • August 2022
  • July 2022
  • June 2022
  • September 2021
  • December 2020
  • November 2020
  • October 2020
  • September 2020
  • August 2020
  • July 2020
  • June 2020
  • May 2020
  • April 2020
  • March 2020
  • February 2020
  • January 2020
  • June 2018
  • May 2018
  • April 2018
  • March 2018
  • February 2018
  • January 2018
Facebook Twitter Instagram Pinterest TikTok
© 2022 E Amazings - All Rights Reserved.

Type above and press Enter to search. Press Esc to cancel.