E Amazings
  • Home
  • Automotive
  • Business
  • CBD
  • Crypto
  • Education
  • Entertainment
  • Fashion
  • Finance
  • Health
  • Home Improvement
  • Law \ Legal
  • News
  • Shopping
  • Sports
  • Technology
  • Travel

Subscribe to Updates

Get the latest creative news from FooBar about art, design and business.

What's Hot

Stocks to buy today: Nykaa, Wipro, SBI, HPCL among list of 20 stocks for profitable trade on August 8

August 8, 2022

JEE Mains Session 2 result declared on jee.nta.ac.in; check how to download | Details here

August 8, 2022

Hackaday Links: August 7, 2022

August 7, 2022
Facebook Twitter Instagram
E Amazings
  • Home
  • Automotive
  • Business
  • CBD
  • Crypto
  • Education
  • Entertainment
  • Fashion
  • Finance
  • Health
  • Home Improvement
  • Law \ Legal
  • News
  • Shopping
  • Sports
  • Technology
  • Travel
Facebook Twitter Instagram
E Amazings
You are at:Home»Education»PROOF POINTS: The paradox of “good” teaching
Education

PROOF POINTS: The paradox of “good” teaching

Paul EasterBy Paul EasterJuly 11, 2022No Comments6 Mins Read
Facebook Twitter Pinterest LinkedIn Tumblr Email
Share
Facebook Twitter Pinterest WhatsApp Email


What is “good” teaching? Ask 10 people and you’ll get 10 different answers. Hollywood celebrates teachers who believe in their students and help them to achieve their dreams. The influential education economist Eric Hanushek, a senior fellow at Stanford University’s Hoover Institution, argues that good teachers raise their students’ achievement. Teachers are expected to impart so many things, from how to study and take notes to how to share and take turns. Deciding what constitutes good teaching is a messy business.

Two researchers from the University of Maryland and Harvard University waded into this mess. They analyzed 53 elementary school teachers who had been randomly assigned to classrooms in their schools located in four different districts along the East Coast. Focusing on math instruction, the researchers compared students’ math scores with surveys that the fourth and fifth-grade students had filled out as part of an experiment. Students were asked to rate their math classes the way consumers fill out customer satisfaction surveys: “This math class is a happy place for me to be;” “Being in this math class makes me feel sad or angry;” “The things we have done this math this year are interesting;” “Because of this teacher, I am learning to love math;” and “I enjoy math class this year.” 

The academics found that there was often a tradeoff between “good teaching” where kids learn stuff and “good teaching” that kids enjoy. Teachers who were good at raising test scores tended to receive low student evaluations. Teachers with great student evaluations tended not to raise test scores all that much. 

“The teachers and the teaching practices that can increase test scores often are not the same as those that improve student-reported engagement,” said David Blazar, one of the study’s co-authors and an associate professor of education policy at the University of Maryland College Park. 

Blazar’s study, “Challenges and Tradeoffs of ‘Good’ Teaching: The Pursuit of Multiple Educational Outcomes,” was co-written with Cynthia Pollard, a doctoral student at Harvard University’s Graduate School of Education. It was publicly posted in June 2022 as a working paper of the Annenberg Institute at Brown University. 

It’s hard to understand exactly why the tradeoff between achievement and student engagement exists. One theory is that “drill and kill” style rote repetition might be effective in helping students do well on tests but make class dreadfully dull. The researchers watched hours of videotaped lessons of these teachers in classrooms, but they didn’t find statistical evidence that teachers who spent more class time on test prep produced higher test scores. High achievement didn’t seem to be associated with rote instruction. 

Instead, it was teachers who had delivered more cognitively demanding lessons, going beyond procedural calculations to complex understandings, who tended to produce higher math scores. The researchers admitted it was “worrisome” that the kind of cognitively demanding instruction that we want to see “can simultaneously result in decreased student engagement.”  

Other researchers and educators have noted that learning is hard work. It often doesn’t feel good for students when they’re making mistakes and struggling to figure things out. It can feel frustrating during the moments when students are learning the most.

It was rare, but the researchers managed to find six teachers among the 53 in the study that could do both types of good teaching simultaneously. Teachers who incorporated a lot of hands-on, active learning received high marks from students and raised test scores. These teachers often had students working together collaboratively in pairs or groups, using tactile objects to solve problems or play games. For example, one teacher had students use egg cartons and counters to find equivalent fractions.

These doubly “good” teachers had another thing in common: they maintained orderly classrooms that were chock full of routines. Though strict discipline and punishing kids for bad behavior has fallen out of fashion, the researchers noticed that these teachers were proactive in setting up clear behavioral rules at the start of each class. “Teachers appeared quite thoughtful and sophisticated in their use of routines to maintain efficiency and order across the classroom,” the researchers wrote. “The time that teachers did spend on student behavior typically involved short redirections that did not interrupt the flow of the lesson.”

These teachers also had a good sense of pacing and understood the limits of children’s attention spans.  Some used timers. One teacher used songs to measure time. “The teachers seemed intentional about the amount of time spent on activities,” the researchers noted. 

Given that it’s not common or easy to engage students and get them to learn math, Blazar was curious to learn which teachers were ultimately better for students in the long run. This experiment actually took place a decade ago in 2012, and the students were tracked afterward. Blazar is currently looking at how these students were doing five and six years later. In his preliminary calculations, he’s finding that the students who had more engaging elementary school teachers subsequently had higher math and reading achievement scores and fewer absences in high school. The students who had teachers who were more effective in raising achievement were generally doing better in high school too, but the long-run benefits faded out somewhat. Though we all want children to learn to multiply and divide, it may be that engaging instruction is ultimately more beneficial. 

Researchers like Blazar dream of developing a “science of teaching,” so that schools of education and school coaches can better train teachers to teach well. But first we need to agree what we want teachers to do and what we want students to achieve.

This story about good teaching was written by Jill Barshay and produced by The Hechinger Report, a nonprofit, independent news organization focused on inequality and innovation in education. Sign up for the Hechinger newsletter.

Related articles

The Hechinger Report provides in-depth, fact-based, unbiased reporting on education that is free to all readers. But that doesn’t mean it’s free to produce. Our work keeps educators and the public informed about pressing issues at schools and on campuses throughout the country. We tell the whole story, even when the details are inconvenient. Help us keep doing that.

Join us today.



Source link

Paul Easter

Related Posts

Child care post-Roe could become even more scarce

By Paul EasterAugust 5, 2022

Spiraling rents are wreaking havoc on college students

By Paul EasterAugust 5, 2022

Dallas parents flocking to schools that pull students from both rich and poor parts of town

By Paul EasterAugust 4, 2022

Eight years after Michael Brown’s death, students at his high school reflect on his legacy

By Paul EasterAugust 4, 2022
Add A Comment

Comments are closed.

Our Picks

Stocks to buy today: Nykaa, Wipro, SBI, HPCL among list of 20 stocks for profitable trade on August 8

By Paul EasterAugust 8, 2022

JEE Mains Session 2 result declared on jee.nta.ac.in; check how to download | Details here

By Paul EasterAugust 8, 2022

Hackaday Links: August 7, 2022

By Paul EasterAugust 7, 2022
Recent Posts
  • Stocks to buy today: Nykaa, Wipro, SBI, HPCL among list of 20 stocks for profitable trade on August 8 August 8, 2022
  • JEE Mains Session 2 result declared on jee.nta.ac.in; check how to download | Details here August 8, 2022
  • Hackaday Links: August 7, 2022 August 7, 2022
  • Despite Bear Market, 2022 Fundraisings Already Surpassed 2021: Messari August 7, 2022
  • Build A Tablet Out Of Your Framework Motherboard August 7, 2022
  • Users in Web3 Will Do a lot More Than Just Trade Crypto: Cronos’ Ken Timsit (Interview) August 7, 2022
  • India poised to achieve $5 trillion economy dream through ‘Atmanirbhar Bharat’ strategy, says expert August 7, 2022
Archives
  • August 2022
  • July 2022
  • June 2022
Facebook Twitter Instagram Pinterest TikTok
  • Home
© 2022 E Amazings - All Rights Reserved.

Type above and press Enter to search. Press Esc to cancel.